From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net, kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com,
johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, hadi@cyberus.ca, tgraf@suug.ch,
marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, davem@redhat.com, jlan@sgi.com,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:30:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050302073045.4dfefa11.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050302010614.2a8bb483.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew wrote:
> 5-10% slowdown on fork is expected, but
> why was exec slower?
Thanks for the summary, Andrew.
Guillaume (or anyone else tempted to do this) - it's a good idea, when
posting 100 lines of data, to summarize with a line or two of words, as
Andrew did here. It is far more efficient for one writer to do this,
than each of a thousand readers.
Hmmm ... so why was exec slower?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-02 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <42168D9E.1010900@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20050218171610.757ba9c9.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <421993A2.4020308@ak.jp.nec.com>
[not found] ` <421B955A.9060000@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <421C2B99.2040600@ak.jp.nec.com>
[not found] ` <421CEC38.7010008@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <421EB299.4010906@ak.jp.nec.com>
[not found] ` <20050224212839.7953167c.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20050227094949.GA22439@logos.cnet>
[not found] ` <4221E548.4000008@ak.jp.nec.com>
[not found] ` <20050227140355.GA23055@logos.cnet>
2005-02-28 1:59 ` Re: A common layer for Accounting packages Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-28 2:32 ` [Lse-tech] " Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 5:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28 7:20 ` [Lse-tech] " Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-28 7:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-28 8:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28 12:10 ` jamal
2005-02-28 9:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 13:20 ` [Lse-tech] " Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 13:40 ` jamal
2005-02-28 13:53 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 9:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 14:10 ` jamal
2005-02-28 14:25 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 15:31 ` jamal
2005-02-28 16:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-01 8:21 ` [Lse-tech] " Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 13:38 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-03-01 13:53 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 14:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-02 4:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-02 8:58 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02 9:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 9:25 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02 15:30 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-03-01 20:40 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050302073045.4dfefa11.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).