netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, jmorris@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: How to handle the multiple aes variants on i386?
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:07:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050303150730.GA4608@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422642F6.5040102@pobox.com>

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:49:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:41:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>...
> >>Not really that easy.  For x86 we have
> >>
> >>	aes
> >>	aes-586
> >>	aes-via
> >
> >
> >Where is aes-via?
> 
> drivers/crypto
> 
> 
> >>And my own personal custom-kernel preference is to use the C version of 
> >>the code on my x86 and x86-64 boxes.
> >
> >
> >That's already not possible today.
> 
> It should be.

OK, rethinking about it, your arguments sound reasonable.

Could anyone explain, what exactly happens if multiple "aes" algorithms 
are compiled into the kernel?

Choosing between the i386 asm and the generic versions seems easy, bug 
the VIA Padlock case sounds more tricky since it works only on a subset 
of the i386 architecture.

> 	Jeff

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-03 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20050223014233.6710fd73.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-02-26 11:31 ` [2.6.11-rc4-mm1 patch] fix buggy IEEE80211_CRYPT_* selects Adrian Bunk
2005-03-02  6:43   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02 14:08     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-02 19:12       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02 20:38         ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 21:07           ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02 21:18             ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 21:56               ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-02 22:14                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 22:41               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02 22:45                 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-02 22:49                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-03 15:07                     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-03-02 21:59         ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050303150730.GA4608@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).