From: domen@coderock.org
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, domen@coderock.org, nacc@us.ibm.com
Subject: [patch 18/26] net/8139too: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:33:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050306103337.3B60B1F202@trashy.coderock.org> (raw)
One thing I would have preferred using here is use wait_event*(), but there is
no condition. However, try_to_freeze(PF_FREEZE) could be used as one, if the
return condition matters -- it can return 0 or 1, from what I understand. If the
intent is to loop until the task is "frozen," then I can revise the patch to use
wait_event_interruptible_timeout().
Replace deprecated interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() function calls
with direct wait-queue usage. I did not find the direct wake_up_interruptible()
function call in this file for the wait-queue, but that may not be an issue.
Patch is compile-tested.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---
kj-domen/drivers/net/8139too.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/net/8139too.c~int_sleep_on-drivers_net_8139too drivers/net/8139too.c
--- kj/drivers/net/8139too.c~int_sleep_on-drivers_net_8139too 2005-03-05 16:12:09.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/drivers/net/8139too.c 2005-03-05 16:12:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@
#include <linux/mii.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/crc32.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -1612,6 +1613,7 @@ static inline void rtl8139_thread_iter (
static int rtl8139_thread (void *data)
{
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
struct net_device *dev = data;
struct rtl8139_private *tp = dev->priv;
unsigned long timeout;
@@ -1622,7 +1624,9 @@ static int rtl8139_thread (void *data)
while (1) {
timeout = next_tick;
do {
- timeout = interruptible_sleep_on_timeout (&tp->thr_wait, timeout);
+ prepare_to_wait(&tp->thr_wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
+ finish_wait(&tp->thr_wait, &wait);
/* make swsusp happy with our thread */
try_to_freeze(PF_FREEZE);
} while (!signal_pending (current) && (timeout > 0));
_
reply other threads:[~2005-03-06 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050306103337.3B60B1F202@trashy.coderock.org \
--to=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).