* [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c
@ 2005-03-06 10:32 domen
2005-03-06 16:40 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: domen @ 2005-03-06 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgarzik; +Cc: netdev, domen, janitor
s/for/list_for_each/
Compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---
kj-domen/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c~list-for-each-drivers_net_ipv6_ip6_fib net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
--- kj/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c~list-for-each-drivers_net_ipv6_ip6_fib 2005-03-05 16:09:09.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2005-03-05 16:09:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct fib6_walker_t fib6_walker_list =
.next = &fib6_walker_list,
};
-#define FOR_WALKERS(w) for ((w)=fib6_walker_list.next; (w) != &fib6_walker_list; (w)=(w)->next)
+#define FOR_WALKERS(w) list_for_each((w), &fib6_walker_list)
static __inline__ u32 fib6_new_sernum(void)
{
_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c
2005-03-06 10:32 [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c domen
@ 2005-03-06 16:40 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-03-06 21:00 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-03-06 22:11 ` Domen Puncer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 @ 2005-03-06 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: domen; +Cc: jgarzik, netdev, janitor, yoshfuji
In article <20050306103238.86F181E46E@trashy.coderock.org> (at Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:38 +0100), domen@coderock.org says:
> s/for/list_for_each/
> Compile tested.
:
> +++ kj-domen/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2005-03-05 16:09:09.000000000 +0100
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct fib6_walker_t fib6_walker_list =
> .next = &fib6_walker_list,
> };
>
> -#define FOR_WALKERS(w) for ((w)=fib6_walker_list.next; (w) != &fib6_walker_list; (w)=(w)->next)
> +#define FOR_WALKERS(w) list_for_each((w), &fib6_walker_list)
>
> static __inline__ u32 fib6_new_sernum(void)
> {
Please don't. fib6_walker_list is not for fib6_walker_t but list_head.
(Or, why don't you convert fib6_walker_t to use list_head families?)
--yoshfuji
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c
2005-03-06 16:40 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
@ 2005-03-06 21:00 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-03-06 22:11 ` Domen Puncer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 @ 2005-03-06 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: domen; +Cc: jgarzik, netdev, janitor, yoshfuji
In article <20050307.014040.48352532.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (at Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:40:40 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> says:
> >
> > -#define FOR_WALKERS(w) for ((w)=fib6_walker_list.next; (w) != &fib6_walker_list; (w)=(w)->next)
> > +#define FOR_WALKERS(w) list_for_each((w), &fib6_walker_list)
> >
> > static __inline__ u32 fib6_new_sernum(void)
> > {
>
> Please don't. fib6_walker_list is not for fib6_walker_t but list_head.
Sorry, I meant: list_for_each is not for fib6_walker_t but list_head.
--yoshfuji
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c
2005-03-06 16:40 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-03-06 21:00 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
@ 2005-03-06 22:11 ` Domen Puncer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Domen Puncer @ 2005-03-06 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@; +Cc: jgarzik, netdev, janitor
On 07/03/05 01:40 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <20050306103238.86F181E46E@trashy.coderock.org> (at Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:38 +0100), domen@coderock.org says:
>
> > s/for/list_for_each/
> > Compile tested.
> :
> > +++ kj-domen/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2005-03-05 16:09:09.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct fib6_walker_t fib6_walker_list =
> > .next = &fib6_walker_list,
> > };
> >
> > -#define FOR_WALKERS(w) for ((w)=fib6_walker_list.next; (w) != &fib6_walker_list; (w)=(w)->next)
> > +#define FOR_WALKERS(w) list_for_each((w), &fib6_walker_list)
> >
> > static __inline__ u32 fib6_new_sernum(void)
> > {
>
> Please don't. fib6_walker_list is not for fib6_walker_t but list_head.
> (Or, why don't you convert fib6_walker_t to use list_head families?)
Makes sense.
How about this compile tested patch:
Convert to use lists from list.h.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
diff -purNX dontdiff c/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
--- c/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2005-03-02 10:32:13.000000000 +0100
+++ a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2005-03-06 23:02:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -95,12 +95,9 @@ static __u32 rt_sernum;
static struct timer_list ip6_fib_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(fib6_run_gc, 0, 0);
struct fib6_walker_t fib6_walker_list = {
- .prev = &fib6_walker_list,
- .next = &fib6_walker_list,
+ .head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(fib6_walker_list.head),
};
-#define FOR_WALKERS(w) for ((w)=fib6_walker_list.next; (w) != &fib6_walker_list; (w)=(w)->next)
-
static __inline__ u32 fib6_new_sernum(void)
{
u32 n = ++rt_sernum;
@@ -849,7 +846,7 @@ static struct fib6_node * fib6_repair_tr
#endif
read_lock(&fib6_walker_lock);
- FOR_WALKERS(w) {
+ list_for_each_entry(w, &fib6_walker_list.head, head) {
if (child == NULL) {
if (w->root == fn) {
w->root = w->node = NULL;
@@ -904,7 +901,7 @@ static void fib6_del_route(struct fib6_n
/* Adjust walkers */
read_lock(&fib6_walker_lock);
- FOR_WALKERS(w) {
+ list_for_each_entry(w, &fib6_walker_list.head, head) {
if (w->state == FWS_C && w->leaf == rt) {
RT6_TRACE("walker %p adjusted by delroute\n", w);
w->leaf = rt->u.next;
diff -purNX dontdiff c/include/net/ip6_fib.h a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
--- c/include/net/ip6_fib.h 2005-01-22 02:48:35.000000000 +0100
+++ a/include/net/ip6_fib.h 2005-03-06 23:03:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <net/flow.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
struct rt6_info;
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ struct rt6_info
struct fib6_walker_t
{
- struct fib6_walker_t *prev, *next;
+ struct list_head head;
struct fib6_node *root, *node;
struct rt6_info *leaf;
unsigned char state;
@@ -95,19 +96,14 @@ extern rwlock_t fib6_walker_lock;
static inline void fib6_walker_link(struct fib6_walker_t *w)
{
write_lock_bh(&fib6_walker_lock);
- w->next = fib6_walker_list.next;
- w->prev = &fib6_walker_list;
- w->next->prev = w;
- w->prev->next = w;
+ list_add(&w->head, &fib6_walker_list.head);
write_unlock_bh(&fib6_walker_lock);
}
static inline void fib6_walker_unlink(struct fib6_walker_t *w)
{
write_lock_bh(&fib6_walker_lock);
- w->next->prev = w->prev;
- w->prev->next = w->next;
- w->prev = w->next = w;
+ list_del_init(&w->head);
write_unlock_bh(&fib6_walker_lock);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-06 22:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-06 10:32 [patch 01/26] list_for_each: net-ipv6-ip6_fib.c domen
2005-03-06 16:40 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-03-06 21:00 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-03-06 22:11 ` Domen Puncer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).