From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>, Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>,
Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@rcn.com>,
Steve Iribarne <steve.iribarne@dilithiumnetworks.com>,
Eran Mann <emann@mrv.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:47:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050310014757.GC12990@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503091730280.16557@filer.marasystems.com>
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> If Linux could manage different IP stacks per interface this would not be
> a problem, but as it is today the same IP stack is used for all interfaces
> making dual homing (not routing) a bit troublesome when the same addresses
> may be in both networks..
Indeed, I have exactly the same problem with a device that must
simultaneously connect to:
- the local customer-site ethernet
- the local customer-site 802.11 wireless
and auto-configure both interfaces using DHCP to connect to hosts on
the internet as best as possible through all available interfaces.
There is absolutely no guarantee that I won't see a network or even
address conflict on the two interfaces, as they may be _separate_
networks each behind a NAT to the outside world over ADSL.
In fact, it's quite likely that DHCP for each interface will provide a
192.168.0.0/24 address, as that seems to be the typical setup of both
kinds of ADSL NAT router...
Any suggestion of asking customer-site to specially configure their
network rather defeats the point, which is a device which
automatically tries available connections, using DHCP, and routes its
traffic over whichever one works best at any time.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-10 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-06 2:20 Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 9:56 ` Martin Mares
2005-03-06 17:01 ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 17:12 ` alex
2005-03-06 17:31 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 19:48 ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 20:19 ` alex
2005-03-06 20:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 20:45 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 21:50 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:50 ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-07 7:01 ` Sumit Pandya
2005-03-07 8:05 ` Eran Mann
2005-03-07 12:14 ` jamal
2005-03-07 23:50 ` jamal
2005-03-08 3:15 ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 13:34 ` jamal
2005-03-08 13:51 ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 13:58 ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:03 ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 14:17 ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:20 ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 18:40 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-08 21:17 ` jamal
2005-03-09 9:09 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 12:39 ` jamal
2005-03-09 13:39 ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-09 14:18 ` jamal
2005-03-09 16:46 ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 10:10 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 17:52 ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-10 6:57 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 22:34 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-10 1:47 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2005-03-08 18:34 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 5:33 ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 14:02 ` Thomas Graf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-08 15:07 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 15:01 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 16:00 ` jamal
2005-03-10 6:48 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 17:33 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 19:40 ` jamal
2005-03-09 21:57 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 0:11 ` jamal
2005-03-09 23:51 Boian Bonev
2005-03-10 0:23 ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 14:35 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 14:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-10 15:04 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 15:25 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050310014757.GC12990@mail.shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=emann@mrv.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=hno@marasystems.com \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mj@ucw.cz \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=steve.iribarne@dilithiumnetworks.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=zdenek@rcn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).