netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>, Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>,
	Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@rcn.com>,
	Steve Iribarne <steve.iribarne@dilithiumnetworks.com>,
	Eran Mann <emann@mrv.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:47:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050310014757.GC12990@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503091730280.16557@filer.marasystems.com>

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> If Linux could manage different IP stacks per interface this would not be 
> a problem, but as it is today the same IP stack is used for all interfaces 
> making dual homing (not routing) a bit troublesome when the same addresses 
> may be in both networks..

Indeed, I have exactly the same problem with a device that must
simultaneously connect to:

     - the local customer-site ethernet
     - the local customer-site 802.11 wireless

and auto-configure both interfaces using DHCP to connect to hosts on
the internet as best as possible through all available interfaces.
There is absolutely no guarantee that I won't see a network or even
address conflict on the two interfaces, as they may be _separate_
networks each behind a NAT to the outside world over ADSL.

In fact, it's quite likely that DHCP for each interface will provide a
192.168.0.0/24 address, as that seems to be the typical setup of both
kinds of ADSL NAT router...

Any suggestion of asking customer-site to specially configure their
network rather defeats the point, which is a device which
automatically tries available connections, using DHCP, and routes its
traffic over whichever one works best at any time.

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-10  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-06  2:20 Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06  9:56 ` Martin Mares
2005-03-06 17:01   ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 17:12     ` alex
2005-03-06 17:31     ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 19:48       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-06 20:19         ` alex
2005-03-06 20:19         ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 20:45           ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:30             ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 21:50               ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-06 21:50             ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-07  7:01               ` Sumit Pandya
2005-03-07  8:05               ` Eran Mann
2005-03-07 12:14                 ` jamal
2005-03-07 23:50                 ` jamal
2005-03-08  3:15                   ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 13:34                     ` jamal
2005-03-08 13:51                       ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 13:58                         ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:03                           ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 14:17                             ` jamal
2005-03-08 14:20                               ` Martin Mares
2005-03-08 18:40                               ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-08 21:17                                 ` jamal
2005-03-09  9:09                                   ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 12:39                                     ` jamal
2005-03-09 13:39                                       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-09 14:18                                         ` jamal
2005-03-09 16:46                                           ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 10:10                                             ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09 17:52                                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-10  6:57                                             ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 22:34                                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-10  1:47                                         ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2005-03-08 18:34                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-03-09  5:33                       ` Zdenek Radouch
2005-03-08 14:02                     ` Thomas Graf
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-08 15:07 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 15:01 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 16:00 ` jamal
2005-03-10  6:48 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE
2005-03-09 17:33 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-09 19:40 ` jamal
2005-03-09 21:57 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10  0:11 ` jamal
2005-03-09 23:51 Boian Bonev
2005-03-10  0:23 ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-10 14:35 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 14:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-10 15:04 Steve Iribarne
2005-03-10 15:25 ` Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050310014757.GC12990@mail.shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=emann@mrv.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=hno@marasystems.com \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=steve.iribarne@dilithiumnetworks.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=zdenek@rcn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).