From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:04:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20050319230458.GB18495@stusta.de> References: <20050316181532.GA3251@stusta.de> <200503172036.j2HKadfm000732@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, bridge@osdl.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: chas3@users.sourceforge.net Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503172036.j2HKadfm000732@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:36:40PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > In message <20050316181532.GA3251@stusta.de>,Adrian Bunk writes: > >Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good > >idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM > >support. > > how about the following? >... Looks good. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed