From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [Infrahip] [PATCH] Host Identity Protocol Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:03:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20050320200356.5f8fa583.davem@davemloft.net> References: <42369919.9010203@cs.helsinki.fi> <20050321.024241.67451836.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: miika@iki.fi, gurtov@cs.helsinki.fi, netdev@oss.sgi.com, infrahip@hiit.fi To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20050321.024241.67451836.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 02:42:41 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote: > However, all signaling should be handled in userspace as we (will) do for MIP6. Yes, I've been telling them similarly in a private email discussion. I'm very glad someone else says this too, so I don't appear as the only person who feels this way :-)