From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:18:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050322021857.GA17972@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050321163358.1b4968a0.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > (Added netdev cc)
> >
> > Felix von Leitner <felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Now about IPv6: npush and npoll are two applications I wrote. npush
> > > sends multicast announcements and opens a TCP socket. npoll receives
> > > the multicast announcement and connects to the source IP/port/scope_id
> > > of the announcement. If both are run on the same machine, npoll sees
> > > the link local address of eth0 as source IP, and the interface number of
> > > eth0 as scope_id. So far so good. Trying to connect() however hangs.
> > > Since this has been broken in different ways for as long as I can
> > > remember in Linux, and I keep complaining about it every half a year or
> > > so. Can't someone fix this once and for all? IPv4 checks whether we
> > > are connecting to our own address and reroutes through loopback, why
> > > can't IPv6?
>
> afaik, this problem is still open. If you have time, please provide
> additional info for the net developers. Maybe the source to npoll anbd
> npush?
Grab the ncp package from http://www.fefe.de/ncp/, or more specifically
ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/network/ncp/ncp-1.2.3.tar.bz2.
It's a very useful and handy tool for pushing around data within
a LAN of a small workgroup, one guy does "npush foo" and yells
at the intended recepient "do npoll". The first one to do
it wins and gets foo ;-)
Johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050311202122.GA13205@fefe.de>
2005-03-12 1:33 ` 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10 Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 2:18 ` Johannes Stezenbach [this message]
2005-03-22 16:22 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2005-03-24 11:59 ` [PATCH] [IPV6] Fix address/interface handling according to the scoping architecture (is Re: 2.6.11: USB broken on nforce4, ipv6 still broken, centrino speedstep even more broken than in 2.6.10) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-04-25 19:57 ` IPv6 has trouble assigning an interface Felix von Leitner
2005-04-25 21:00 ` Pekka Savola
2005-04-26 6:10 ` Felix von Leitner
2005-04-27 22:57 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-27 23:31 ` David Stevens
2005-04-25 22:38 ` David Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050322021857.GA17972@linuxtv.org \
--to=js@linuxtv.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).