* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503230011090.4207@kaki.stanford.edu> @ 2005-03-23 11:30 ` Herbert Xu 2005-03-23 12:40 ` jamal 2005-03-23 18:27 ` Yichen Xie 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Herbert Xu @ 2005-03-23 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yichen Xie; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, davem, kaber, hadi Yichen Xie <yxie@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > Is the memory block allocated on line 315 leaked every time tcp_ipt_dump > is called? It seems to be. This patch should free it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> BTW, please report networking bugs to netdev@oss.sgi.com. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- ===== net/sched/ipt.c 1.14 vs edited ===== --- 1.14/net/sched/ipt.c 2005-02-07 16:39:40 +11:00 +++ edited/net/sched/ipt.c 2005-03-23 22:28:13 +11:00 @@ -284,10 +284,12 @@ tm.lastuse = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - p->tm.lastuse); tm.expires = jiffies_to_clock_t(p->tm.expires); RTA_PUT(skb, TCA_IPT_TM, sizeof (tm), &tm); + kfree(t); return skb->len; rtattr_failure: skb_trim(skb, b - skb->data); + kfree(t); return -1; } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 11:30 ` memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? Herbert Xu @ 2005-03-23 12:40 ` jamal 2005-03-23 12:55 ` Thomas Graf 2005-03-23 18:27 ` Yichen Xie 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: jamal @ 2005-03-23 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: Yichen Xie, linux-kernel, netdev, David S. Miller, kaber On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 06:30, Herbert Xu wrote: > Yichen Xie <yxie@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > > Is the memory block allocated on line 315 leaked every time tcp_ipt_dump > > is called? > > It seems to be. This patch should free it. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > > BTW, please report networking bugs to netdev@oss.sgi.com. > Thanks for pointing this out - I _know_ its in the kernel list FAQ. I was sitting beside R Gooch when he added "thou shalt post to netdev". And of course i am gonna bitch about it every time someone doesnt post to netdev;-> Just a small correction to patchlet: The second kfree should check for existence of t. cheers, jamal > Thanks, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 12:40 ` jamal @ 2005-03-23 12:55 ` Thomas Graf 2005-03-23 13:11 ` jamal 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Thomas Graf @ 2005-03-23 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jamal; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Yichen Xie, linux-kernel, netdev, David S. Miller, kaber * jamal <1111581618.1088.72.camel@jzny.localdomain> 2005-03-23 07:40 > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 06:30, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Yichen Xie <yxie@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > > > Is the memory block allocated on line 315 leaked every time tcp_ipt_dump > > > is called? > > > > It seems to be. This patch should free it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > Just a small correction to patchlet: > The second kfree should check for existence of t. t is either valid or NULL so it's not a problem, unless you want to create janitor work of course. ;-> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 12:55 ` Thomas Graf @ 2005-03-23 13:11 ` jamal 2005-03-23 13:23 ` Thomas Graf 2005-03-23 13:40 ` Jan Engelhardt 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: jamal @ 2005-03-23 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Graf Cc: Herbert Xu, Yichen Xie, linux-kernel, netdev, David S. Miller, kaber On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 07:55, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <1111581618.1088.72.camel@jzny.localdomain> 2005-03-23 07:40 > > Just a small correction to patchlet: > > The second kfree should check for existence of t. > > t is either valid or NULL so it's not a problem, unless you want > to create janitor work of course. ;-> if t is null you still goto rtattr_failure I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over net/sched? didnt understand the janitor part. cheers, jamal ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 13:11 ` jamal @ 2005-03-23 13:23 ` Thomas Graf 2005-03-23 13:32 ` jamal 2005-03-23 13:40 ` Jan Engelhardt 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Thomas Graf @ 2005-03-23 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jamal; +Cc: Herbert Xu, Yichen Xie, linux-kernel, netdev, David S. Miller, kaber * jamal <1111583497.1089.92.camel@jzny.localdomain> 2005-03-23 08:11 > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 07:55, Thomas Graf wrote: > > * jamal <1111581618.1088.72.camel@jzny.localdomain> 2005-03-23 07:40 > > > > Just a small correction to patchlet: > > > The second kfree should check for existence of t. > > > > t is either valid or NULL so it's not a problem, unless you want > > to create janitor work of course. ;-> > > if t is null you still goto rtattr_failure > I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you > pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over > net/sched? kfree simply does nothing if it is given a null pointer so that goto rtattr_failure for t == NULL is handled just fine without a check. I will never get used to this behaviour and policy as well though, it somewhat makes code less readable. > didnt understand the janitor part. It will probably be removed again by one of the regular 'remove unnecessary pre kfree checks' patchsets. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 13:23 ` Thomas Graf @ 2005-03-23 13:32 ` jamal 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: jamal @ 2005-03-23 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Graf Cc: Herbert Xu, Yichen Xie, linux-kernel, netdev, David S. Miller, kaber On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:23, Thomas Graf wrote: > > kfree simply does nothing if it is given a null pointer so that > goto rtattr_failure for t == NULL is handled just fine without > a check. I will never get used to this behaviour and policy as > well though, it somewhat makes code less readable. > I cant get used to it either; actually i dont think i would be able to stop my fingers ;-> > > didnt understand the janitor part. > > It will probably be removed again by one of the regular 'remove > unnecessary pre kfree checks' patchsets. > Yes, already Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> has made that point - although he did not post to netdev!! ;-> So ignore my comment Herbert cheers, jamal ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 13:11 ` jamal 2005-03-23 13:23 ` Thomas Graf @ 2005-03-23 13:40 ` Jan Engelhardt 2005-03-23 14:05 ` jamal 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-03-23 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jamal; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev >I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you >pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over >net/sched? Not only net/sched. The C standard requires that free(NULL) works. Jan Engelhardt -- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 13:40 ` Jan Engelhardt @ 2005-03-23 14:05 ` jamal 2005-03-23 14:12 ` jamal 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: jamal @ 2005-03-23 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:40, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you > >pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over > >net/sched? > > Not only net/sched. The C standard requires that free(NULL) works. Thanks for clarifying this. cheers, jamal ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 14:05 ` jamal @ 2005-03-23 14:12 ` jamal 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: jamal @ 2005-03-23 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev Actually its well documented even on the man pages - so should have not even have bothered discussing it;-> Should get new brand of coffee. Apologies for unecessarily abused electrons - which means dont respond ;-> cheers, jamal On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 09:05, jamal wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:40, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >I have seen people put little comments of "kfree will work if you > > >pass it NULL" - are you saying such assumptions exist all over > > >net/sched? > > > > Not only net/sched. The C standard requires that free(NULL) works. > > Thanks for clarifying this. > > cheers, > jamal > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 11:30 ` memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? Herbert Xu 2005-03-23 12:40 ` jamal @ 2005-03-23 18:27 ` Yichen Xie 2005-03-23 20:37 ` Herbert Xu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Yichen Xie @ 2005-03-23 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Herbert Xu'; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, davem, kaber, hadi Thanks for confirming. Are you guys interested in this kind of leaks? I have a list of about a hundred generated by our tool. -yichen > -----Original Message----- > From: Herbert Xu [mailto:herbert@gondor.apana.org.au] > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:31 AM > To: Yichen Xie > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@oss.sgi.com; > davem@davemloft.net; kaber@trash.net; hadi@cyberus.ca > Subject: Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? > > Yichen Xie <yxie@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > > Is the memory block allocated on line 315 leaked every time > > tcp_ipt_dump is called? > > It seems to be. This patch should free it. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > > BTW, please report networking bugs to netdev@oss.sgi.com. > > Thanks, > -- > Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ > Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ > PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt > -- > ===== net/sched/ipt.c 1.14 vs edited ===== > --- 1.14/net/sched/ipt.c 2005-02-07 16:39:40 +11:00 > +++ edited/net/sched/ipt.c 2005-03-23 22:28:13 +11:00 > @@ -284,10 +284,12 @@ > tm.lastuse = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - p->tm.lastuse); > tm.expires = jiffies_to_clock_t(p->tm.expires); > RTA_PUT(skb, TCA_IPT_TM, sizeof (tm), &tm); > + kfree(t); > return skb->len; > > rtattr_failure: > skb_trim(skb, b - skb->data); > + kfree(t); > return -1; > } > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? 2005-03-23 18:27 ` Yichen Xie @ 2005-03-23 20:37 ` Herbert Xu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Herbert Xu @ 2005-03-23 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yichen Xie; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev, davem, kaber, hadi On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:27:32AM -0800, Yichen Xie wrote: > Thanks for confirming. Are you guys interested in this kind of leaks? I have > a list of about a hundred generated by our tool. -yichen Certainly. Please post all the networking leaks to netdev@oss.sgi.com. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-23 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503230011090.4207@kaki.stanford.edu>
2005-03-23 11:30 ` memory leak in net/sched/ipt.c? Herbert Xu
2005-03-23 12:40 ` jamal
2005-03-23 12:55 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-23 13:11 ` jamal
2005-03-23 13:23 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-23 13:32 ` jamal
2005-03-23 13:40 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-03-23 14:05 ` jamal
2005-03-23 14:12 ` jamal
2005-03-23 18:27 ` Yichen Xie
2005-03-23 20:37 ` Herbert Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).