netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: gcc confused about static inline. - route.c
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:59:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050328145908.6f2cd38a@es175> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050328214103.GA3609@redhat.com>

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:41:03 -0500
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 01:23:14PM -0800, cliff white wrote:
>  > 
>  > Building the gkernel bits, have this error:
>  > 
>  > net/ipv4/route.c: In function `rt_remove_balanced_route':
>  > net/ipv4/route.c:151: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'compare_keys': function body not available
>  > net/ipv4/route.c:540: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
>  > 
>  > route.c has this define at line 151
>  > :
>  > static inline int compare_keys(struct flowi *fl1, struct flowi *fl2);
>  > 
>  > function body is defined starting at line 861. 
>  > 
>  > We are using gcc 3.4.2 right now, is there a way to fix this?
>  > thanks
>  > cliffw
> 
> 
> Shuffling the order of the functions fixed this for me.
> 
Thanks, that looked like the answer, but i wanted to ask anyway...
cliffw

> 		Dave
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> 
> diff -urNp --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux-10001/init/Makefile linux-10002/init/Makefile
> --- linux-2.6.11/net/ipv4/route.c~	2005-03-24 19:18:24.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.11/net/ipv4/route.c	2005-03-24 19:19:39.000000000 -0500
> @@ -520,6 +520,13 @@ static inline u32 rt_score(struct rtable
>  	return score;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int compare_keys(struct flowi *fl1, struct flowi *fl2)
> +{
> +	return memcmp(&fl1->nl_u.ip4_u, &fl2->nl_u.ip4_u, sizeof(fl1->nl_u.ip4_u)) == 0 &&
> +	       fl1->oif     == fl2->oif &&
> +	       fl1->iif     == fl2->iif;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED
>  static struct rtable **rt_remove_balanced_route(struct rtable **chain_head,
>  						struct rtable *expentry,
> @@ -858,13 +865,6 @@ work_done:
>  out:	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int compare_keys(struct flowi *fl1, struct flowi *fl2)
> -{
> -	return memcmp(&fl1->nl_u.ip4_u, &fl2->nl_u.ip4_u, sizeof(fl1->nl_u.ip4_u)) == 0 &&
> -	       fl1->oif     == fl2->oif &&
> -	       fl1->iif     == fl2->iif;
> -}
> -
>  static int rt_intern_hash(unsigned hash, struct rtable *rt, struct rtable **rp)
>  {
>  	struct rtable	*rth, **rthp;
> 


-- 
"Ive always gone through periods where I bolt upright at four in the morning; 
now at least theres a reason." -Michael Feldman

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-28 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-28 21:23 gcc confused about static inline. - route.c cliff white
2005-03-28 21:41 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-28 22:59   ` cliff white [this message]
2005-03-28 21:53 ` Francois Romieu
2005-03-28 23:00   ` cliff white

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050328145908.6f2cd38a@es175 \
    --to=cliffw@osdl.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).