From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [RFC] TCP congestion schedulers Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:03:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20050329120306.558cea0c.davem@davemloft.net> References: <421D30FA.1060900@ev-en.org> <20050225120814.5fa77b13@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050309210442.3e9786a6.davem@davemloft.net> <4230288F.1030202@ev-en.org> <20050310182629.1eab09ec.davem@davemloft.net> <20050311120054.4bbf675a@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050311201011.360c00da.davem@davemloft.net> <20050314151726.532af90d@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050322074122.GA64595@muc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, shemminger@osdl.org, ak@muc.de, baruch@ev-en.org Return-path: To: John Heffner In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:32:33 -0500 (EST) John Heffner wrote: > The motivation for my question is that I get very unpredictable > performance over loopback with UP for all architectures, often varying by > more than a factor of two. I haven't really tried to track down the > cause, but an important characteristic seems to be that the greater the > differential between the CPU utilization of the sender and the receiver, > the slower the throughput. (But I'm not sure if there's a causal relation > here.) Maybe this is simply scheduler strangeness, since it doesn't seem > to be an issue that I've noticed on SMP. Has anyone seen this or know > offhand what's going on? It could be L2 cache-coloring effects as well. Try to keep the working set size smaller than the L2 cache size of the cpu you are on.