From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: Linux support for RDMA (was: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 18:26:35 -0700
Message-ID: <20050403012635.GA4218@colo.lackof.org>
References: <1112426991.424e49ef57e2b@imap.linux.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
        Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
        Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@yahoo.com>, open-iscsi@googlegroups.com,
        "David  S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, mpm@selenic.com,
        andrea@suse.de, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu,
        James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, ksummit-2005-discuss@thunk.org,
        netdev@oss.sgi.com, bmt@zurich.ibm.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: jaganav@us.ibm.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1112426991.424e49ef57e2b@imap.linux.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:29:51AM -0500, jaganav@us.ibm.com wrote:
> If this dual license is a concern to other kernel developers as well from
> contributing to OpenRDMA, we would seriously consider this and discuss
> with the adapter vendors.

I'm not concerned with it. If *BSD can thrive with it's license,
I don't see why it's a problem for linux.

HP is going to pay me to work on the code regardless of the license.
Projects I work on privately happen to be GPL though I'm not religous
about it.  If people choose NOT to volunteer time/effort on dual licensed
code, I understand and respect that. There are enough worthy GPL only
projects out there.

I'm speaking for myself and NOT for HP.

grant