From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:31:09 -0600 Message-ID: <20050404063109.GA30855@colo.lackof.org> References: <20050324233921.GZ14202@opteron.random> <20050325034341.GV32638@waste.org> <20050327035149.GD4053@g5.random> <20050327054831.GA15453@waste.org> <1111905181.4753.15.camel@mylaptop> <20050326224621.61f6d917.davem@davemloft.net> <52vf7bwo4w.fsf@topspin.com> <1112042936.5088.22.camel@beastie> <20050328223203.GC28983@kvack.org> <1112465317.24936.10.camel@mylaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "open-iscsi@googlegroups.com" , "David S. Miller" , mpm@selenic.com, andrea@suse.de, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, ksummit-2005-discuss@thunk.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Dmitry Yusupov Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112465317.24936.10.camel@mylaptop> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:08:37AM -0800, Dmitry Yusupov wrote: > So, who cares if one of those cores will do receive side copying? It burns backplane bandwidth that could be used for other things. The problem isn't the CPU cycles. It's the number of times the data has to cross the memory bus. grant