From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [07/08] [TCP] Fix BIC congestion avoidance algorithm error
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:47:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050405164758.GH17299@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050405164539.GA17299@kroah.com>
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
Since BIC is the default congestion control algorithm
enabled in every 2.6.x kernel out there, fixing errors
in it becomes quite critical.
A flaw in the loss handling caused it to not perform
the binary search regimen of the BIC algorithm
properly.
The fix below from Stephen Hemminger has been heavily
verified.
[TCP]: BIC not binary searching correctly
While redoing BIC for the split up version, I discovered that the existing
2.6.11 code doesn't really do binary search. It ends up being just a slightly
modified version of Reno. See attached graphs to see the effect over simulated
1mbit environment.
The problem is that BIC is supposed to reset the cwnd to the last loss value
rather than ssthresh when loss is detected. The correct code (from the BIC
TCP code for Web100) is in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
--- 1.92/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2005-02-22 10:45:31 -08:00
+++ edited/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2005-03-23 10:55:18 -08:00
@@ -1653,7 +1653,10 @@
static void tcp_undo_cwr(struct tcp_sock *tp, int undo)
{
if (tp->prior_ssthresh) {
- tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->snd_ssthresh<<1);
+ if (tcp_is_bic(tp))
+ tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->bictcp.last_max_cwnd);
+ else
+ tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->snd_ssthresh<<1);
if (undo && tp->prior_ssthresh > tp->snd_ssthresh) {
tp->snd_ssthresh = tp->prior_ssthresh;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050405164539.GA17299@kroah.com>
2005-04-05 16:47 ` [05/08] [IPSEC]: Do not hold state lock while checking size Greg KH
2005-04-05 16:47 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-04-05 18:22 ` [07/08] [TCP] Fix BIC congestion avoidance algorithm error Theodore Ts'o
2005-04-05 18:26 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-05 18:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050405164758.GH17299@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).