From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH] network configs: disconnect network options from drivers Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:04:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20050405210406.GA10325@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <20050330234709.1868eee5.randy.dunlap@verizon.net> <20050331185226.GA8146@mars.ravnborg.org> <424C5745.7020501@osdl.org> <20050331203010.GA8034@mars.ravnborg.org> <4250B4C5.2000200@osdl.org> <20050404195051.GA12364@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , ioe-lkml@axxeo.de, matthew@wil.cx, lkml , netdev@oss.sgi.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, cfriesen@nortel.com, tgraf@suug.ch Return-path: To: Sridhar Samudrala Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:42:25AM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > >Only bit that I am worried about is the statement in SCTP: > > depends on IPV6 || IPV6=n > > > >That looked like a noop to me. It had the sideeffect that SCTP > >menu entries where idented an extra level which was not desireable > >with currect layout. > > > > No. This is not a noop. This is required to restrict SCTP configured as > static when IPV6 is configured as module. I see now - thanks. Sam