From: Wang Jian <lark@linux.net.cn>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:29:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050405212711.0253.LARK@linux.net.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050405125237.GN26731@postel.suug.ch>
Hi Thomas Graf,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:52:37 +0200, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> wrote:
>
> > When linux's QoS control capability is widely used, such web interface
> > sooner or later comes into being.
>
> That might be true but I will never ack on something that makes zero
> collision use of cls_fw impossible. I'm all for improving this but
> not at the cost of reduced performance for the most obvious use case
> of cls_fw.
Agree.
>
> > Your suggestion is very considerable. But that needs some more work. And,
> > isn't that some bloated?
>
> The shift + bitmask might be bloated and can be deferred a bit until
> someone comes up with this need. I can cook up a patch for this
> if you want, it's not much work.
I am glad that you are willing to help to hook them up. I really need
the new hashing way.
--
lark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 5:35 [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function Wang Jian
2005-04-05 5:37 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-05 6:05 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 10:25 ` jamal
2005-04-05 10:38 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-05 11:25 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 12:16 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-05 12:39 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 12:52 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-05 13:29 ` Wang Jian [this message]
2005-04-05 12:54 ` jamal
2005-04-05 14:18 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-05 16:11 ` jamal
2005-04-06 6:45 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-06 12:16 ` jamal
2005-04-06 12:30 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-06 13:01 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-06 13:34 ` jamal
2005-04-06 13:45 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-06 14:10 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-06 18:15 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-06 18:31 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 0:55 ` [RFC] dynamic hash table size & xor hash function for cls_fw Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 10:38 ` jamal
2005-04-07 10:47 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-07 10:51 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 11:07 ` jamal
2005-04-07 13:09 ` [PATCH] [PKT_SCHED]: improve hashing performance of cls_fw Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 13:31 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-07 13:52 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-07 14:03 ` Wang Jian
2005-04-06 13:36 ` [PATCH] improvement on net/sched/cls_fw.c's hash function Eran Mann
2005-04-06 13:53 ` Wang Jian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050405212711.0253.LARK@linux.net.cn \
--to=lark@linux.net.cn \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).