From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:31:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20050407113121.31b71a94.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20050407164146.GA6479@ev-en.org> <20050407101653.2cc68db1@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <42557895.8040004@ev-en.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, werner@almesberger.net Return-path: To: Baruch Even In-Reply-To: <42557895.8040004@ev-en.org> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:14:45 +0100 Baruch Even wrote: > > Going back to the pre-westwood code in BK, the /2 is still there. > > This wasn't there in 2.4.23 on which on the original work of H-TCP was > done. Not true, that division by 2 is in the 2.4.23 sources, I just checked. It is there as far back as BK logs go in both the 2.4.x and 2.6.x trees. Perhaps the WEB100 guys patched that test, I bet that's why you don't remember it being in 2.4.23