From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [IPSEC]: Kill nested read lock by deleting xfrm_init_tempsel Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:35:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20050421163526.7a29a76f.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20050328233917.GB15369@gondor.apana.org.au> <424B40C2.90304@trash.net> <20050331004658.GA26395@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050331212325.5e996432.davem@davemloft.net> <20050402004956.GA24339@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050401172007.7296eced.davem@davemloft.net> <20050402020947.GA24998@gondor.apana.org.au> <42501E51.3000401@trash.net> <20050405103918.GA24863@gondor.apana.org.au> <4252EEA2.5020107@trash.net> <20050406022155.GA12952@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kaber@trash.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@redhat.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: <20050406022155.GA12952@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:21:55 +1000 Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:01:38PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > > > Good idea, I didn't think of this. This patch is without replacement of > > xfrm_init_tempsel(), it caused an "unused function" warning and, as I > > mentioned before, I still need the function. > > Thanks. Just one more issue that I can think of, the check should > only be done when tmpl->id.spi != 0. Otherwise the presence of > valid states with differing state selectors will prevent new > sessions from starting up. Is it really worthwhile, right now, to change that tmpl->id.daddr to daddr? That seems to be all that Patrick's most recent patch does.