From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: akepner@sgi.com, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, ak@muc.de,
gnb@sgi.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:51:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050425115108.5fbb8b07.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114428355.7669.157.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:25:55 -0400
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
> Dang, I just noticed you used TCP. Could you use UDP please?
>
> While the suspect may be PIO/s - lets be scientific and prove it.
Jamal, enough already... stop being such a control freak.
You're exceeding me as a control freak, and that's saying
something.
The guy got the numbers for us, in response to their claim that
on their systems cpu utilization is poor due to NAPI. Are you
not convinced of this yet?
Will a hundred new sets of numbers using the precise driver and
protocol of your choosing convince you more of this? I think
you're making unreasonable reqeusts of the problem submitter at
this point, and we should be sending them patches to test not
a new set of tests to run.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-25 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-18 6:11 NAPI, e100, and system performance problem Brandeburg, Jesse
2005-04-18 12:14 ` jamal
2005-04-18 15:36 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-18 16:55 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-04-18 19:34 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-18 20:26 ` jamal
2005-04-19 5:55 ` Greg Banks
2005-04-19 18:36 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-19 20:38 ` NAPI and CPU utilization [was: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem] Arthur Kepner
2005-04-19 20:52 ` Rick Jones
2005-04-19 21:09 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <20050420145629.GH19415@sgi.com>
2005-04-20 15:15 ` NAPI, e100, and system performance problem jamal
2005-04-22 11:36 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-22 12:33 ` jamal
2005-04-22 17:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-22 18:18 ` jamal
2005-04-22 18:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-04-22 18:37 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-04-22 18:52 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504241845070.2934@linux.site>
2005-04-25 11:25 ` jamal
2005-04-25 18:51 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-04-25 11:41 ` jamal
2005-04-25 12:16 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2005-04-22 19:01 ` jamal
2005-04-22 19:07 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-22 19:21 ` jamal
2005-04-23 20:50 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-23 16:56 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-22 23:28 ` Greg Banks
2005-04-22 23:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-04-22 23:43 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-23 2:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-04-23 17:54 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-23 3:04 ` jamal
2005-04-23 17:14 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-22 14:52 ` Robert Olsson
2005-04-22 15:37 ` jamal
2005-04-22 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050425115108.5fbb8b07.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akepner@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).