From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next. Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:16:33 -0500 Message-ID: <200504270016.34002.dtor_core@ameritech.net> References: <20050411125932.GA19538@uganda.factory.vocord.ru> <1114574809.14282.10.camel@uganda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Greg KH , Jamal Hadi Salim , Kay Sievers , Herbert Xu , James Morris , Guillaume Thouvenin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Graf , Jay Lan Return-path: To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru In-Reply-To: <1114574809.14282.10.camel@uganda> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 26 April 2005 23:06, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Let's clarify that we are talking about userspace->kernelspace > direction. > Only for that messages callback path is invoked. What about kernelspace->userspace or kernelspace->kernelspace? >>From what I see nothing stops kernel code from calling cn_netlink_send, in fact your cbus does exactly that. So I am confused why you singled out userspace->kernelspace direction. -- Dmitry