From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: patch: policy update by id Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:43:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20050427194356.58a3e618.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1114602874.7670.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114604657.7670.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114604826.7670.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050427233924.GA22238@gondor.apana.org.au> <1114650816.7663.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050428012135.GA22950@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050428013014.GA23043@gondor.apana.org.au> <1114653140.7663.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050428020754.GA23326@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: <20050428020754.GA23326@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:07:54 +1000 Herbert Xu wrote: > You know what, I actually agree with you :) But you'll need to convince > Dave: > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/net/0305.3/0018.html I'm willing to reneg on that position if you can convince me that security minded folks won't be surprised by this pseudo- aliasing. For example, do firewall systems tend to support such priority schemes? If so, I guess we can do it.