From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 23:55:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050430215550.GH577@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114894202.8929.165.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* jamal <1114894202.8929.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-04-30 16:50
> I think we may have to define what the scope of classid is. It seems to
> me the scope needs to be _local_ to either ingress or egress.
> OTOH, something like a fwmark is _global_.
> At least this is what my thoughts were when doing that piece.
> Using those rules, the situation Patrick describes on violates this
> (because stolen packets still maintain the classid), yours doesnt -
> unless we change the scope of classid.
Right, although I would define local as per device on either ingress
or egress. What I'm looking for in particular is a way to transfer
classification decisions from one device to another. A common case
for this is if a packet enters the packet, gets encapsulated and
leaves the host in some kind of tunnel. It's pretty hard to do
classification on the tunnel device so you want to do it before
the encapsulation and copy the result over to the tunnel. We can
use nfmark for this but i'd rather have a well defined variable
for this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-30 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-30 16:50 patch: Action repeat jamal
2005-04-30 17:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:27 ` jamal
2005-04-30 18:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 19:51 ` jamal
2005-04-30 20:08 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-30 20:50 ` jamal
2005-04-30 21:55 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-04-30 22:34 ` jamal
2005-04-30 23:58 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-02 12:10 ` jamal
2005-05-02 15:06 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 11:46 ` jamal
2005-05-04 12:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-04 12:31 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 12:59 ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:28 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33 ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:48 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:53 ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:05 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 14:23 ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:53 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-05 13:06 ` jamal
2005-05-01 0:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-01 0:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-03 23:28 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050430215550.GH577@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).