From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 14:31:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* jamal <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-04 07:46
> Basically, something along those lines (eg struct tca_pkt_info) in which
> the tcf_result is one of the components should do it.
>
> I would be satisfied with this being the structure in the ->act()
> parameters because then it could also be used to pass action-metadata
> around (no action written so far needs such coordination, but its been
> one of those things i have been thinking of for some dynamic creations
> for example where the return code is insufficient to describe things).
> Patrick, either you or i could do it. It doesnt matter if at the moment
> the structure only contains tcf_result or elements of tcf_result because
> i will add more to it later. Then we could kill access to tc_classid in
> exec()
Sounds good.
> Global I believe means you dont reset it when you clone/copy.
> skb->tc_verd is only cleared when we free the skb at the moment and
> transfered when we clone or copy. A bit or two could be reserved in the
> tc_verd to say "clear tc_classid" and have the meta action decide if it
> is global(dont clear) or not(clear - current behavior) during
> clone/copy . Does this sound reasonable?
I have no objections but fail to see why we want to clear it anyway?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-04 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-30 16:50 patch: Action repeat jamal
2005-04-30 17:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 17:27 ` jamal
2005-04-30 18:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-30 19:51 ` jamal
2005-04-30 20:08 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-30 20:50 ` jamal
2005-04-30 21:55 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-30 22:34 ` jamal
2005-04-30 23:58 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-02 12:10 ` jamal
2005-05-02 15:06 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 11:46 ` jamal
2005-05-04 12:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-04 12:31 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-05-04 12:59 ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:28 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:33 ` jamal
2005-05-04 13:48 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 13:53 ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:05 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-04 14:23 ` jamal
2005-05-04 14:53 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-05 13:06 ` jamal
2005-05-01 0:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-01 0:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-03 23:28 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).