From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 15:33:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20050504133306.GC18452@postel.suug.ch> References: <1114894202.8929.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430215550.GH577@postel.suug.ch> <1114900485.8929.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430235809.GI577@postel.suug.ch> <1115035838.8929.236.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115211549.7665.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504132822.GB18452@postel.suug.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Patrick McHardy , netdev , "David S. Miller" Return-path: To: jamal Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050504132822.GB18452@postel.suug.ch> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Thomas Graf <20050504132822.GB18452@postel.suug.ch> 2005-05-04 15:28 > * jamal <1115211549.7665.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-04 08:59 > > On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 14:31 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > * jamal <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-04 07:46 > > > > > > tc_verd to say "clear tc_classid" and have the meta action decide if it > > > > is global(dont clear) or not(clear - current behavior) during > > > > clone/copy . Does this sound reasonable? > > > > > > I have no objections but fail to see why we want to clear it anyway? > > > > > > > If its scope is local i.e for one device, then not reseting could > > confuse the next device that sees it and tries to classify on it. > > OK, so we're not talking about a reset in action_exec() but rather > in tc_classify() or enqueue()? Sorry, little bit to vague, what I mean is before the first call to tc_classify() or enqueue() on a new device.