From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Peter Buckingham <peter@pantasys.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Mystery packet killing tg3
Date: 5 May 2005 20:56:35 +0200
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:56:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050505185635.GE24386@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <427A6898.4070804@pantasys.com>
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:40:24AM -0700, Peter Buckingham wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >That should be impossible. Or it sounds like a serious
> >hardware problem. DAC should normally always work with all e1000 AFAIK.
>
> okay.
>
> I basically just force it to take a 32bit dma mask. I admit i'm a little
> clueless as to what this truely means. I had assumed that it would
> result in only dma'ing to an area below 4GB, but I hadn't really
> validated that assumption :-(
If you dont use iommu=force it will only cause IOMMU remapping
when the memory buffer is beyond 4GB. It is basically random
if that happens or not, depending on how fully your memory is.
With iommu=force or CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUG all IO is foced
through the IOMMU.
>
> >Most likely you have some hardware problem and it is somehow magically
> >worked around by IOMMU remapping. One difference is that
> >the remapping makes all IO slower, perhaps the changed timing
> >works around some bug.
>
> this is always a possibility, can you suggest some ways of isolating
> this problem?
Hmm - if you want to hack the kernel you could add udelay()s
to the no IOMMU paths in arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c
and see if that cures the problem too. If yes then the timing
theory would be proved.
Actually the IOMMU code does more than just delaying, it also
does config space accesses which might flush or synchronize
things in the PCI bridges. Perhaps adding some dummy access
for that would be good too.
The dmesg looks similar to the previous one from the IOMMU
code perspective.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-05 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-02 23:24 Mystery packet killing tg3 Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 3:02 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 21:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 21:13 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 20:41 ` Michael Chan
2005-05-03 22:03 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 21:28 ` Michael Chan
2005-05-03 22:53 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 22:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 22:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 22:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 21:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-04 18:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-04 18:44 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 11:43 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-05 18:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 17:09 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 17:32 ` Rick Jones
2005-05-05 17:38 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 17:45 ` John Heffner
2005-05-05 18:06 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 18:21 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 18:31 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 18:40 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 18:56 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-05-05 19:02 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 19:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-04 19:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-04 6:09 Michael Chan
2005-05-04 6:27 Michael Chan
2005-05-04 22:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-04 22:30 ` Michael Chan
[not found] ` <20050505113356.0f1b4c00.davem@davemloft.net>
2005-05-05 19:56 ` Michael Chan
2005-05-05 21:42 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050505185635.GE24386@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=peter@pantasys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).