From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 18:36:59 +1000
Message-ID: <20050506083659.GH8255@krispykreme>
References: <20050504230731.12be1bc3.davem@davemloft.net> <20050506043653.GD8255@krispykreme> <20050506054516.GE8255@krispykreme> <20050505231345.4296d9b5.davem@davemloft.net> <20050506071005.GG8255@krispykreme> <20050506011954.18176751.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050506011954.18176751.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

 
> > eth0 data: 66 frags: 2892 4
> 
> What does this "66 frags" mean?  Is it "tso_segs" from
> the SKB?  skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags can never be that
> large (MAX_SKB_FRAGS is (65536/PAGE_SIZE + 2)) so it
> can't be that.

Nah I just dump the skb mapping then the subsequent frags. So 66 is the
size of the header. In this case there is only 2 frags.

Anton