From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] TCP congestion infrastructure
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20050509.171711.75189002.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20050506173729.20140.93205.37072@galon.ev-en.org>
	<20050509162214.0a8c9ceb@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: baruch@ev-en.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, doug.leith@nuim.ie
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: shemminger@osdl.org
In-Reply-To: <20050509162214.0a8c9ceb@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Subject: [RFC] TCP congestion infrastructure
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:22:14 -0700

> I rebased the H-TCP patches on my current work and 2.6.12-rc4 and put them in
> 	http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger/patches/2.6.12-rc4-tcp/
> 
> Includes infrastructure and all the current variants: BIC, Westwood, Vegas
>     plus  H-TCP, Hybla

I like it.  Looks fine from here.

This, along with the TSO reworking, will go in at the next
opportunity which is likely 2.6.13 of course.

I'm considering putting the TSO stuff into 2.6.12 because
in many ways it is a bug fix, TSO is fairly broken without
it.  There are some loose ends I need to resolve first though.