From: Jonathan Day <imipak@yahoo.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: A different question, on SGI's STP for Linux
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:47:14 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050512044714.62495.qmail@web31504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
Hi,
Another quick question, chasing the ones on QoS. At
one point, SGI had an intriguing prototype
implementation of something called the "Scheduled
Transfer Protocol" for Linux. Sadly, this project
seems to have vanished into the mists. I -think- I
have a copy, somewhere, that I downloaded from the
Open Source projects site.
I presume, from the fact that nobody else seems to
have picked it up, that STP isn't as useful as it
sounds. Is it something that would be worth
forward-porting to a recent kernel, or is it more of a
dead-end approach that can be done as well by other
means?
Jonathan
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
reply other threads:[~2005-05-12 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050512044714.62495.qmail@web31504.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=imipak@yahoo.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox