From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:41:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20050513094135.GD1780@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050512225026.GA2822@elf.ucw.cz> <200505131136.56641.vda@ilport.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jketreno@linux.intel.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel list , jbohac@suse.cz, jbenc@suse.cz Return-path: To: Denis Vlasenko Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200505131136.56641.vda@ilport.com.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi! > > There's a lot to clean up in header file, too... And this time it > > actually works. > > Since you apparently have this hardware, > I'm going to hijack your attention for a second > for the benefit of wireless crowd. > > How good it it? Signal strength/sensitivity? No idea, flat I live in is so small I can get away with connecting using bluetooth. > Does driver/fw/hw survive prolonged packet flood testing? > I'm asking because so far I never saw 11g hw which does. > I tried prism54 and acx111. Is ipw2000 worth buying? I'm not sure if ipw2100 supports 802.11g.... Pavel -- Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.