From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
Subject: Re: ipw2100: intrusive cleanups, working this time ;-)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:36:56 +0300
Message-ID: <200505131136.56641.vda@ilport.com.ua>
References: <20050512225026.GA2822@elf.ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jbohac@suse.cz, jbenc@suse.cz
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, jketreno@linux.intel.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050512225026.GA2822@elf.ucw.cz>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Friday 13 May 2005 01:50, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> There's a lot to clean up in header file, too... And this time it
> actually works.

Since you apparently have this hardware,
I'm going to hijack your attention for a second
for the benefit of wireless crowd.

How good it it? Signal strength/sensitivity?

Does driver/fw/hw survive prolonged packet flood testing?
I'm asking because so far I never saw 11g hw which does.
I tried prism54 and acx111. Is ipw2000 worth buying?
--
vda