From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20050517.140245.71090021.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <m1k6lx7gkf.fsf@muc.de>
	<20050517.132202.59028935.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20050517202730.GA79960@muc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dlstevens@us.ibm.com, akepner@sgi.com, jheffner@psc.edu,
        netdev@oss.sgi.com, netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: ak@muc.de
In-Reply-To: <20050517202730.GA79960@muc.de>
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Date: 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200

> But it's not clear such a hack would be worth it anyways. 
> If anything it would be probably better to let mountd set the RTTs, e.g. 
> implicitely with MSG_CONFIRM (I hope it is using it these days ...) 

I think we should implement a solution that goes beyond
the confines of NFS.