From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20050517.142406.11598558.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20050517202730.GA79960@muc.de>
	<20050517.140245.71090021.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20050517211300.GB79960@muc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dlstevens@us.ibm.com, akepner@sgi.com, jheffner@psc.edu,
        netdev@oss.sgi.com, netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: ak@muc.de
In-Reply-To: <20050517211300.GB79960@muc.de>
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Date: 17 May 2005 23:13:01 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 23:13:00 +0200

> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:02:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
> > Date: 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200,Tue, 17 May 2005 22:27:30 +0200
> > 
> > > But it's not clear such a hack would be worth it anyways. 
> > > If anything it would be probably better to let mountd set the RTTs, e.g. 
> > > implicitely with MSG_CONFIRM (I hope it is using it these days ...) 
> > 
> > I think we should implement a solution that goes beyond
> > the confines of NFS.
> 
> Nothing in MSG_CONFIRM is NFS specific.

I'm referring to mountd.