From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc5] tg3: add bcm5752 entry to pci.ids Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 18:46:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20050527224636.GA1677@redhat.com> References: <20050527184750.GB11592@tuxdriver.com> <20050527.123037.68041200.davem@davemloft.net> <1117221859.4310.6.camel@rh4> <20050527.134032.78491984.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: mchan@broadcom.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, jgarzik@pobox.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050527.134032.78491984.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:40:32PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: "Michael Chan" > Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:24:19 -0700 > > > So in the future, do we need to patch this file or just let sourceforge > > take care of it? > > I think the proper procedure is to send it to sourceforge. > But there is some latency in the changes making it back > into the kernel. The latest diff vs mainline is always available at http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/pci/ (Comedy aside, I dont even remember which box is running the cronjob that generates those files any more, good that its still ticking :-) Greg did a sync up a while ago, but didn't seem too enthusiastic about doing it regularly, due to the fact that /proc/pci is aparently going away. Dave