From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 03:28:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050528012810.GN15391@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117242749.6251.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* jamal <1117242749.6251.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-27 21:12
> > Yet unconverted
> > are: netfilter, net/sched/ tcp_diag, xfrm, kernel/audit.
> >
>
> I didnt find any issues with these as far as PID extrapolation.
I should have written, yet unchecked.
> > I also fixed some uses of NL_CREDS() to fetch the pid for
> > message generation which is wrong. Various dumping procedures
> > did not set the multi flag at all, I fixed all of them.
> >
> > Do not apply these patches yet, they're way too intrusive
>
> Do you mean the two patches? Those looked fine to me;
Yes, those two patches. My part comes directly out of my fingers
and is only compile tested. I didn't even run them yet.
> i.e its mostly the patch i posted this morning with the new Macros, no?
I went through all users of NLMSG_PUT in the modules you touched and
checked if they properly set NLM_F_MULTI and used the new macro when
appropriate.
Anyways, I want to be careful with this, there might be userspace
apps which rely on pid being filled in from siocb->scm->creds or
userspace apps which don't expect the NLM_F_MULTI flag even when
they should so we should check with all parties involved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-28 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-27 12:32 PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting jamal
2005-05-27 12:50 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 13:58 ` jamal
2005-05-27 14:13 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 15:01 ` jamal
2005-05-27 15:19 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 15:57 ` jamal
2005-05-27 16:59 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] [NETLINK] Introduce NLMSG_NEW macro to better handle netlink flags Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the pid Thomas Graf
2005-05-28 1:06 ` jamal
2005-05-31 22:37 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-28 1:12 ` PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting jamal
2005-05-28 1:28 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-05-28 1:48 ` jamal
2005-05-28 12:18 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-28 16:00 ` jamal
2005-05-28 16:16 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-31 9:39 ` jamal
2005-05-31 9:41 ` who 王海
2005-05-31 21:43 ` PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting David S. Miller
2005-05-31 22:26 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-31 22:31 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-02 13:04 ` PATCH: explicit typing WAS(Re: " jamal
2005-06-02 13:30 ` jamal
2005-06-03 5:08 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050528012810.GN15391@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).