From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:16:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050528161637.GT15391@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117296041.19563.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* jamal <1117296041.19563.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-28 12:00
> > I just tested both patches for about 30 minutes. Everything OK. Feel
> > free to apply the patches.
>
> We have another problem. What tree is this against? Both patches have
> failures patching against latest davem and linus git trees.
It's against my davem-pending tree which should reflect the current
state of davem's tree so they _should_ apply on his side. In this
specific case you're probably missing the neighbour table patches.
Basically I produce diffs this way:
separate tree per patchset -> merge into testing tree ->
testing period -. merge into $person-pending -> extraction
of patches and submission.
I was trying to get some more quality control into my workflow,
so I started testing patches for 3-4 weeks to avoid fallouts
but apparently this is failing miserably at the moment due to
some broken scripts of mine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-28 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-27 12:32 PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting jamal
2005-05-27 12:50 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 13:58 ` jamal
2005-05-27 14:13 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 15:01 ` jamal
2005-05-27 15:19 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 15:57 ` jamal
2005-05-27 16:59 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] [NETLINK] Introduce NLMSG_NEW macro to better handle netlink flags Thomas Graf
2005-05-27 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] [NETLINK] Correctly set NLM_F_MULTI without checking the pid Thomas Graf
2005-05-28 1:06 ` jamal
2005-05-31 22:37 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-28 1:12 ` PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting jamal
2005-05-28 1:28 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-28 1:48 ` jamal
2005-05-28 12:18 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-28 16:00 ` jamal
2005-05-28 16:16 ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2005-05-31 9:39 ` jamal
2005-05-31 9:41 ` who 王海
2005-05-31 21:43 ` PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting David S. Miller
2005-05-31 22:26 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-31 22:31 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-02 13:04 ` PATCH: explicit typing WAS(Re: " jamal
2005-06-02 13:30 ` jamal
2005-06-03 5:08 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050528161637.GT15391@postel.suug.ch \
--to=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).