From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:16:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20050528161637.GT15391@postel.suug.ch> References: <20050527141320.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527151913.GA15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117209466.6383.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527165935.GC15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117242749.6251.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050528012810.GN15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117244893.6251.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050528121827.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117296041.19563.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: jamal Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1117296041.19563.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * jamal <1117296041.19563.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-28 12:00 > > I just tested both patches for about 30 minutes. Everything OK. Feel > > free to apply the patches. > > We have another problem. What tree is this against? Both patches have > failures patching against latest davem and linus git trees. It's against my davem-pending tree which should reflect the current state of davem's tree so they _should_ apply on his side. In this specific case you're probably missing the neighbour table patches. Basically I produce diffs this way: separate tree per patchset -> merge into testing tree -> testing period -. merge into $person-pending -> extraction of patches and submission. I was trying to get some more quality control into my workflow, so I started testing patches for 3-4 weeks to avoid fallouts but apparently this is failing miserably at the moment due to some broken scripts of mine.