From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [IPV4/IPV6] Replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:44:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050602094404.GA10316@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 799 bytes --]
Hi Dave:
In light of my recent patch to net/ipv4/udp.c that replaced the
spin_lock_irq calls on the receive queue lock with spin_lock_bh,
here is a similar patch for all other occurences of spin_lock_irq
on receive/error queue locks in IPv4 and IPv6.
In these stacks, we know that they can only be entered from user
or softirq context. Therefore it's safe to disable BH only.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Since this patch simply improves the consistent use of locking
primitives rather fixing any real bugs, it should probably go
into net-2.6.13.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
[-- Attachment #2: p --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3423 bytes --]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -360,14 +360,14 @@ int ip_recv_error(struct sock *sk, struc
err = copied;
/* Reset and regenerate socket error */
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_err = 0;
if ((skb2 = skb_peek(&sk->sk_error_queue)) != NULL) {
sk->sk_err = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb2)->ee.ee_errno;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_error_report(sk);
} else
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
out_free_skb:
kfree_skb(skb);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/raw.c b/net/ipv4/raw.c
--- a/net/ipv4/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/raw.c
@@ -691,11 +691,11 @@ static int raw_ioctl(struct sock *sk, in
struct sk_buff *skb;
int amount = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (skb != NULL)
amount = skb->len;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
return put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/datagram.c b/net/ipv6/datagram.c
--- a/net/ipv6/datagram.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/datagram.c
@@ -353,14 +353,14 @@ int ipv6_recv_error(struct sock *sk, str
err = copied;
/* Reset and regenerate socket error */
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_err = 0;
if ((skb2 = skb_peek(&sk->sk_error_queue)) != NULL) {
sk->sk_err = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb2)->ee.ee_errno;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
sk->sk_error_report(sk);
} else {
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_error_queue.lock);
}
out_free_skb:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/raw.c b/net/ipv6/raw.c
--- a/net/ipv6/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/raw.c
@@ -434,12 +434,12 @@ csum_copy_err:
/* Clear queue. */
if (flags&MSG_PEEK) {
int clear = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (skb == skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
clear = 1;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (clear)
kfree_skb(skb);
}
@@ -971,11 +971,11 @@ static int rawv6_ioctl(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb;
int amount = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (skb != NULL)
amount = skb->tail - skb->h.raw;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
return put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -300,12 +300,12 @@ csum_copy_err:
/* Clear queue. */
if (flags&MSG_PEEK) {
int clear = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (skb == skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
clear = 1;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
if (clear)
kfree_skb(skb);
}
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-02 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-02 9:44 Herbert Xu [this message]
2005-06-02 9:54 ` [SCTP] Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock_bh Herbert Xu
2005-06-03 5:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-03 5:10 ` [IPV4/IPV6] Replace spin_lock_irq " David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050602094404.GA10316@gondor.apana.org.au \
--to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox