From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Oester Subject: Re: Unitialized queue_lock oops? Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:38:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20050604003835.GA29635@linuxace.com> References: <20050603232413.GA29308@linuxace.com> <20050604000046.GA29438@linuxace.com> <20050604003441.GA20471@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Herbert Xu Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050604003441.GA20471@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:34:41AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 05:00:46PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote: > > > > Yes, default qdisc. Interesting that 2.6.10 is rock solid on the same > > hardware...oh well. > > Well if you do have the time feel free to keep searching back to 2.6.10. > Even though I'd say that this is most likely to turn out to be a hardware > problem, there is no telling what you might find along the way. > > At least it might tell us what sort of hardware problems would result in > only networking crashes :) If this were your average hardware problem > I'd have expected to see crashes all over the place, especially under > fs/ and mm/. Ok, how bout next week I adjust OSPF costs to make my secondary firewall primary, and see if I still have problems? At least then we can put the hardware problem theory behind us... Phil