From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Netdev list <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"James P. Ketrenos" <ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: ipw2100: firmware problem
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:27:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050608212707.GA2535@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A723D3.3060001@linux.intel.com>
Hi!
> >I'm fighting with firmware problem: if ipw2100 is compiled into
> >kernel, it is loaded while kernel boots and firmware loader is not yet
> >available. That leads to uninitialized (=> useless) adapter.
> >
> >
> We've been looking into whether the initrd can have the firmware affixed
> to the end w/ some magic bytes to identify it. If it works, enhancing
> the request_firmware to support both hotplug and an initrd approach may
> be reasonable.
That seems pretty ugly to me... imagine more than one driver does this
:-(.
> >What's the prefered way to solve this one? Only load firmware when
> >user does ifconfig eth1 up? [It is wifi, it looks like it would be
> >better to start firmware sooner so that it can associate to the
> >AP...].
> >
> >
> The debate goes back and forth on whether devices should come up only
> after they are told, or initialize and start looking for a network as
> soon as the module is loaded.
>
> I lean more toward having the driver just do what it is told, defaulting
> to trying to scan and associate so link is ready as soon as possible.
> We've added module parameters to change that behavior (disable and
> associate for the ipw2100).
Having a parameter to control this seems a bit too complex to me.
How is
insmod ipw2100 enable=1
different from
insmod ipw2100
iwconfig eth1 start_scanning_or_whatever
?
Pavel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-08 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-08 14:23 ipw2100: firmware problem Pavel Machek
2005-06-08 14:44 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-08 14:56 ` Jirka Bohac
2005-06-08 16:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-21 7:42 ` Simon Kelley
2005-06-21 8:29 ` Feyd
2005-06-21 8:46 ` Simon Kelley
2005-06-08 15:05 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-06-08 15:23 ` Jiri Benc
2005-06-09 6:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-09 6:16 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-09 6:25 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-09 6:28 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-09 6:37 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-09 8:36 ` Wichert Akkerman
2005-06-09 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-09 19:53 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-09 21:01 ` James Ketrenos
2005-06-09 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-09 21:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-09 22:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-10 2:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-10 2:46 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-06-10 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-10 13:00 ` John Stoffel
2005-06-10 13:33 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-06-09 14:31 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-06-10 6:56 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-10 13:23 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-06-10 20:26 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-10 21:00 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-06-10 21:07 ` Lee Revell
2005-06-13 16:42 ` Jan Rychter
2005-06-11 12:44 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-08 17:10 ` James Ketrenos
2005-06-08 19:43 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-08 19:49 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-08 19:54 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-09 6:03 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-09 6:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-09 6:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-09 6:20 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-09 6:30 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-09 6:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-10 3:51 ` Jim Crilly
2005-06-09 6:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-09 6:13 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-09 6:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-08 16:58 ` James Ketrenos
2005-06-08 21:27 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-06-08 21:46 ` James Ketrenos
2005-06-08 22:34 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-09 3:33 ` Zhu Yi
2005-06-09 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-09 13:56 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-09 21:12 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-06-09 23:13 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050608212707.GA2535@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).