From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: ipw2100: firmware problem Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:00:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20050610090022.GF4173@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200506090909.55889.vda@ilport.com.ua> <20050608.231657.59660080.davem@davemloft.net> <20050609104205.GD3169@elf.ucw.cz> <20050609.125324.88476545.davem@davemloft.net> <42A8AE2A.4080104@linux.intel.com> <42A8F758.2060008@pobox.com> <42A8FF03.3010508@linuxwireless.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , James Ketrenos , "David S. Miller" , vda@ilport.com.ua, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com Return-path: To: Alejandro Bonilla Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42A8FF03.3010508@linuxwireless.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi! > OK. I understand the point and I totally agree with this. We really want > the adapter to just do what the user or profiles ask the adapter to do. > Yes, in an ideal world. > > Let's talk about easyness. These adapters are in laptops. You don't want > to type a lot of stop everytime you move from access points, reboots > and We are not trying to make it hard to the users. Lets do the right thing in kernel, and let userspace make it easy. Pavel