From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tgraf@suug.ch
Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050707.141718.85410359.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050706124206.GW16076@postel.suug.ch>
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:42:06 +0200
> The inital issue you brought up which you backed up with numbers
> is probably the cause of multiple wrong branch predictions due
> to the fact that I wrote skb = dequeue(); if (skb) which was
> assumed to be likely by the compiler. In your patch you fixed
> this with !skb_queue_empty() which fixed this wrong prediction
> and also acts as a little optimization due to skb_queue_empty()
> being really simple to implement for the compiler.
As an aside, this reminds me that as part of my quest to make
sk_buff smaller, I intend to walk across the tree and change
all tests of the form:
if (!skb_queue_len(list))
into:
if (skb_queue_empty(list))
It would be really nice, after the above transformation and some
others, to get rid of sk_buff_head->qlen. Why? Because that
also allows us to remove the skb->list member as well, as it's
the only reason for existing is so that the SKB queue removal
routines can decrement the queue length.
That's kind of silly, and most SKB lists in the kernel do not care
about the queue length at all. Rather, they care about empty and
non-empty. The cases that do care (mostly packet schedulers) can
keep track of the queue length themselves in their private data
structures. When they remove packets, they _know_ which queue to
decrement the queue length of.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-07 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-11 21:15 [TG3]: Add hw coalescing infrastructure David S. Miller
2005-05-11 21:17 ` Michael Chan
2005-05-12 2:28 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-12 7:53 ` Robert Olsson
2005-06-22 15:25 ` [TG3]: About " Eric Dumazet
2005-06-22 19:03 ` Michael Chan
2005-07-04 21:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-04 21:26 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-04 21:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-04 21:49 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-04 22:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-04 22:47 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-04 22:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-04 22:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-04 23:01 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-05 7:38 ` [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c Eric Dumazet
2005-07-05 11:51 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-05 12:03 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-05 13:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-05 13:48 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-05 15:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-05 17:34 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-05 21:22 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-05 21:33 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-05 21:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-05 23:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-05 23:41 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-05 23:45 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-05 23:55 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-06 0:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-06 0:51 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-06 1:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-06 1:07 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-06 0:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-06 1:02 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-06 1:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-06 12:42 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-07 21:17 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-07-07 21:34 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-07 22:24 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <42CE22CE.7030902@cosmosbay.com>
2005-07-08 7:30 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-08 8:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-08 11:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-07-12 4:02 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-05 21:26 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-28 15:52 ` [PATCH] Add prefetches in net/ipv4/route.c Eric Dumazet
2005-07-28 19:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-28 20:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-28 20:58 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-28 21:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-28 22:44 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-29 14:50 ` Robert Olsson
2005-07-29 17:06 ` Rick Jones
2005-07-29 17:44 ` Robert Olsson
2005-07-29 17:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-29 18:25 ` Rick Jones
2005-07-31 3:52 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <42EDDA50.4010405@cosmosbay.com>
2005-08-01 15:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-31 3:51 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-31 3:44 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-04 23:00 ` [TG3]: About hw coalescing infrastructure David S. Miller
2005-07-05 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-04 22:47 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C045E0FB0@orsmsx408>
2005-07-07 22:30 ` [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050707.141718.85410359.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).