From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, wensong@linux-vs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce netfilte sk_buff enlargement
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:23:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050720132305.GA4077@rama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050718.203145.105430424.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1637 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 08:31:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:04:51 +0200
>
> > The only real in-tree user of nfcache was IPVS, who only needs a single
> > bit. Unfortunately I couldn't find some other free bit in sk_buff to
> > stuff that bit into, so I introduced a separate field for them. Maybe
> > the IPVS guys can resolve that to further save space.
>
> I think we must resolve this one before 2.6.14 goes out, which
> gives us a lot of time, but for now I'll eat that one-bit member.
Well, I hope IPVS people will take care of this. I don't really know
that code too well...
> > Initially I wanted to shrink pkt_type to three bits (PACKET_HOST and
> > alike are only 6 values defined), but unfortunately the bluetooth code
> > overloads pkt_type :(
>
> This also must be cured somehow, that really isn't a clean nor nice
> usage of this field.
I just ran into Marcel Holtmann earlier today. He thinks moving that
data into the cb is fine, though he has to double-check that.
He also said that he really only needs 5 bits, so even if the current
pkt_type overloading would persist, we could probably shrink it to make
space for the IPVS bit.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-20 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-16 21:40 [PATCH] reduce netfilte sk_buff enlargement Harald Welte
2005-07-19 3:31 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-19 7:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-07-19 7:23 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-20 13:23 ` Harald Welte [this message]
2005-07-20 15:43 ` Wensong Zhang
2005-07-20 21:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-20 18:43 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-21 18:20 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-07-21 20:12 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-21 21:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-07-21 22:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-21 22:29 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-21 23:49 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-07-21 23:52 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-22 0:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-07-22 22:54 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-23 1:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-07-25 2:18 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-22 8:34 ` Amin Azez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050720132305.GA4077@rama \
--to=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).