From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: argh... ;/
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:20:59 -0400
Message-ID: <20050805172055.GB5641@tuxdriver.com>
References: <42F2D749.70306@gmail.com> <200508060241.30507.phillips@istop.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kernel-mentors@selenic.com, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kernel-mentors-bounces@selenic.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200508060241.30507.phillips@istop.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-mentors>,
	<mailto:kernel-mentors-request@selenic.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/kernel-mentors>
List-Post: <mailto:kernel-mentors@selenic.com>
List-Help: <mailto:kernel-mentors-request@selenic.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-mentors>,
	<mailto:kernel-mentors-request@selenic.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: kernel-mentors-bounces@selenic.com
Errors-To: kernel-mentors-bounces@selenic.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:41:30AM +1000, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2005 13:04, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
> > I accidentaly posted the patches as MIME attachments... its 5:03 am here

> Does anybody still care if patches are posted as attachments, particularly for 
> review as opposed to submission?

Yes.  Opening attachments makes them harder to review.
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com