From: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
To: shemminger@osdl.org
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Possible race with br_del_if()
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:40:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050818214036.GH10593@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello,
I've encountered several oops when adding and removing interfaces from
bridges while using Xen. Most of the details are available [1]here.
The short of it is the following sequence:
CPU0 CPU1
add_del_if() unregister_netdevice()
br_del_if() notifier_call_chain(NETDEV_UNREGISTER)
del_nbp()
br_stp_disable_port() // port->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED
br_device_event() // dev->br_port != NULL yet
// event is NETDEV_UNREGISTER
br_del_if()
sysfs_remove_dir(p)
kobject_del()
dget(dentry)
BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)
This sequence doesn't happen all of the time. In many cases, CPU0 moves
along right into destroy_nbp() which sets dev->br_port = NULL, and
be_device_event check (p == NULL) hits and a second br_del_if() isn't
called.
The attached patch is a workaround for the double case, but I'm not sure
if is the right way to deal with this issue, or if it any issue at all.
1. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com
diffstat output:
br_if.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
---
Simple workaround for double call to br_del_if().
Signed-off-by: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
--- linux-2.6.12/net/bridge/br_if.c 2005-06-17 14:48:29.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.12-xen0-smp/net/bridge/br_if.c 2005-08-18 15:17:27.302615846 -0500
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@
{
struct net_bridge_port *p = dev->br_port;
- if (!p || p->br != br)
+ if (!p || p->br != br || p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
return -EINVAL;
br_sysfs_removeif(p);
next reply other threads:[~2005-08-18 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-18 21:40 Ryan Harper [this message]
2005-08-18 22:12 ` Possible race with br_del_if() Stephen Hemminger
2005-08-18 22:23 ` Ryan Harper
2005-08-18 22:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-08-18 22:56 ` Ryan Harper
2005-08-19 19:10 ` Ryan Harper
2005-08-19 19:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-10-11 20:33 ` [PATCH] br: fix race on bridge del if Stephen Hemminger
2005-10-12 22:10 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050818214036.GH10593@us.ibm.com \
--to=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).