netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	bharata@in.ibm.com, shai@scalex86.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch 7/11] net: Use bigrefs for net_device.refcount
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:53:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050913185348.GA3724@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43271A28.9090301@cosmosbay.com>

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:27:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Ravikiran G Thirumalai a écrit :
> 
> Hum...
> 
> Did you tried to place refcnt/netdev_refcnt in a separate cache line than 
> queue_lock ? I got good results too...
> 
> >  	/* device queue lock */
> >  	spinlock_t		queue_lock;
> >  	/* Number of references to this device */
> > -	atomic_t		refcnt;
> > +	struct bigref	        netdev_refcnt ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp ; 
> >  	/* delayed register/unregister */
> >  	struct list_head	todo_list;
> >  	/* device name hash chain */
> 
> Every time a cpu take the queue_lock spinlock, it exclusively gets one 
> cache line. If another cpu try to access netdev_refcnt, it has to grab this 
> cache line (even if properely per_cpu designed, there is still one shared 
> field). In fact the whole struct net_device should be re-ordered for 
> SMP/NUMA performance.

I agree. Maybe placing the queue_lock in a different cacheline is the 
right approach?

Thanks,
Kiran

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-13 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20050913155112.GB3570@localhost.localdomain>
2005-09-13 16:10 ` [patch 7/11] net: Use bigrefs for net_device.refcount Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-13 16:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-09-13 16:35     ` Ben Greear
2005-09-13 16:46       ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-09-13 20:26     ` David S. Miller
2005-09-13 22:16       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-13 18:27   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-13 18:53     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2005-09-13 16:12 ` [patch 8/11] net: dst_abstraction macros Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-13 16:17 ` [patch 9/11] net: dst_entry.refcount, use, lastuse to use alloc_percpu Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-13 20:24   ` David S. Miller
2005-09-13 22:07     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-13 22:12       ` David S. Miller
2005-09-13 23:17         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-13 23:27           ` David S. Miller
2005-09-14  7:21             ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050913185348.GA3724@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bharata@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shai@scalex86.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).