From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13 0/5] normalize calculations of rx_dropped
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:57:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051024215751.GH28212@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <435D53AE.3020401@candelatech.com>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:35:42PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> It doesn't matter too much to me either way, but I'd like for there to
> be a precisely documented definition for the various net-stats so that
> I can correctly show the values to user-space (I can certainly add
> rx_discards
> to rx_errors for a 'total rx errors' value, but I need to know whether
> rx_discards is already in rx_errors to keep from counting things twice.)
My opinion is that:
-- rx_errors should count all "on the wire" hardware errors;
-- rx_missed_errors should count frames w/ no "on the wire"
errors that cannot be received by the hardware (generally
due to lack of DMA bufers); and,
-- rx_discards should count frames dropped by the kernel
after successful reception by the hardware.
I do _not_ think rx_missed_errors should be counted as part of
rx_errors, but I could be persuaded otherwise.
> Jeff: Could you lay down the law somewhere in the Documentation/
> directory and then let us start fixing any driver that does it differently?
It does seem like a netdev stats clarification doc would be
appropriate. Does anyone have the beginnings of this?
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-24 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050822181726.GJ2736@tuxdriver.com>
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 0/5] normalize calculations of rx_dropped John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 1/5] 3c59x: correct rx_dropped counting John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 2/5] e1000: " John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 3/5] e100: correct rx_dropped and add rx_missed_errors John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:49 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/5] ixgb: correct rx_dropped counting John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:49 ` [patch 2.6.13 5/5] tg3: correct rx_dropped and add rx_missed_errors John W. Linville
2005-09-12 18:53 ` [patch 2.6.13 0/5] normalize calculations of rx_dropped Jeff Garzik
2005-09-12 19:14 ` John W. Linville
2005-10-24 21:35 ` Ben Greear
2005-10-24 21:57 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2005-10-25 1:15 ` Ben Greear
2005-10-25 1:42 ` jamal
2005-10-25 19:50 ` Ingo Oeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051024215751.GH28212@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).