From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:32:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051118163208.GA23355@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437DFD6C.1020106@pobox.com>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:12:28AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:33:02AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >>This patch removes the obsolete drivers/net/eepro100.c driver.
> >>
> >>Is there any reason why it should be kept?
> >
> >
> >Tt's the only driver which works correctly on ARM CPUs. e100 is
> >basically buggy. This has been discussed here on lkml and more
> >recently on linux-netdev. If anyone has any further questions
> >please read the archives of those two lists.
>
> After reading the archives, one discovers the current status is:
>
> waiting on ARM folks to test e100
>
> Latest reference is public message-id <4371A373.6000308@pobox.com>,
> which was CC'd to you.
>
> There is a patch in netdev-2.6.git#e100-sbit and in Andrew's -mm tree
> that should solve the ARM problems, and finally allow us to kill
> eepro100. But it's waiting for feedback...
So what you're saying is that it's down to me to test the thing.
Ok.
I've been extremely patient waiting for e100 to get fixed (it's been
literally _years_), and I think it isn't surprising that the hardware
it was noticed on has been packed away.
Now I ask the same of others for when I'm (a) well enough to enter
the cold environment in which this machine is currently stored and
(b) can find the time to resurect the machine.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-18 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-18 3:33 [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Adrian Bunk
2005-11-18 9:01 ` Russell King
2005-11-18 9:08 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 16:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-18 16:32 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-11-19 20:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:15 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 22:24 ` Russell King
2005-11-24 10:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-23 22:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-23 22:53 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 23:01 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 17:04 ` Tim Schmielau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 18:18 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-05 18:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-05 21:04 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-01-15 0:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-15 13:19 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-17 18:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-17 22:27 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-18 0:32 ` John W. Linville
2006-01-18 0:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-18 10:34 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:08 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051118163208.GA23355@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saw@saw.sw.com.sg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).