From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13]: Netfilter IPsec support Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:36:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20051122.193631.76306901.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4383C31A.40101@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, kaber@trash.net Return-path: To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Herbert Xu Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:35:53 +1100 > How about merging the patches that everybody has agreed on first? > > So far, I haven't see any objections to patches 1 and 2 so they > can go in straight away. They don't even touch IPv6. > > Patches 3-6 could become redundant if you go with my suggestion. > > The rest of them I haven't read yet so can't comment :) View the net-2.6.16 GIT tree as a sort of playpen, much like -mm, until we get close to the real 2.6.16 upstream development openning up. I rebase all the time, and I can pluck out and change patches at will.