From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20051123.150132.85058719.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20051123221547.GM15449@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20051123.143946.41188551.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20051123225319.GP15449@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, bunk@stusta.de, saw@saw.sw.com.sg,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1030479AbVKWXBk@vger.kernel.org>
To: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk
In-Reply-To: <20051123225319.GP15449@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:53:19 +0000

> That means there's about 15 minutes left before I go to sleep before
> having to be up early tomorrow to go on a 2 hour journey to attend a
> meeting.  What do you want me to do with those 15 minutes?  Perform a
> miracle maybe?

It's perfectly fine that you are not able to test the fix.  But being
so visibly angry about it, that's the part I don't get.

How about a "I'm not able to test this due to lack of access to the
necessary hardware, but I did give it a try although unsuccessful.
Perhaps someone else can lend a hand so we can resolve this for good?"

That's the "calm" response.