Re: Broadcom 43xx first results

[Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1392 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:05:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Harald Welte wrote:
> >I also think that there is a lack of knowledge on the architecture of
> >802.11 low-level protocols and drivers among many people (including
> >myself) in the network community.  Only this way I can explain why there
> >are always people who claim that the kernel already has a 802.11
> >'stack'.
> 
> This last sentence, regardless of the source, is simply playing with words.

I don't think that having clear definitions of certain terms is playing
with words.  I don't neccessarily care which words are used, but it's
always useful to have common, well-defined terminology.

I also wouldn't call the TCP code a stack, if it hadn't all the state
engine in it.  

> We have 802.11 common code in the kernel, that several drivers are
> using.  

Yes.

> Future drivers should modify that common code to suit their
> needs, rather than dropping it and starting from scratch.

I did not state that it has to be replaced.  I'm much in favour of
gradual changes myself.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>          	        http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]